This blog is a place for us to share our thoughts, ideas, opinions, observations,and feelings about the books that we read. Please use it often, remembering to be open-minded and respectful of others' postings as you do. Please also feel free to expand upon the posts by sharing your own questions.
Sod Houses of the 1800s
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Chapter Nine
Do you think it was fair for Pa to hold Mr. Lasker responsible for Billy's disappearance? Please be sure to explain yourself thoroughly.
I think not fair.It was not fair when Pa let Billy go with the Mr.Lasker and Pa was supposed to know where Billy was because after all he is Billy's father.
It is not fair for Pa to blame Mr. Lasker for Billy's dissappearance because no one contacted him about Billy tagging along.He didn't know he was responsible for Billy because billy stopped to say goodbye to someone instead of making sure Mr. Lasker was paying attention to him. So therefore I don't think that it is fair.
I think it is unfair because Mr. Lasker didn't know that Billy was coming. I believe this because he can't blame Mr. Lasker for Billy not coming because Mr. Lasker had no clue that Billy was coming. To make sure that Billy got on Mr. Lasker's cart he could have told Mr. Lasker that Billy was coming with them.
I think it isn't fair because its Pas kid, but its also Mr. Laskers fault because he should have checked with pa before they left to see if they had everyone and instead of sending Sam by himself Mr.Lasker should have gone.
I don't think it is fair to blame Mr.Lasker for Billy disappearing because he didn't know that Billy was coming with him.
ReplyDeletePa hadn't contacted Mr. Lasker about Billy tagging along so I don't think it is fair
ReplyDeleteI think isn't fair because Billy its Pa's son and he should know where his son is at all times.
ReplyDeleteI think not fair.It was not fair when Pa let Billy go with the Mr.Lasker and Pa was supposed to know where Billy was because after all he is Billy's father.
ReplyDeleteIt is not fair for Pa to blame Mr. Lasker for Billy's dissappearance because no one contacted him about Billy tagging along.He didn't know he was responsible for Billy because billy stopped to say goodbye to someone instead of making sure Mr. Lasker was paying attention to him. So therefore I don't think that it is fair.
ReplyDeleteI think it is unfair because Mr. Lasker didn't know that Billy was coming. I believe this because he can't blame Mr. Lasker for Billy not coming because Mr. Lasker had no clue that Billy was coming. To make sure that Billy got on Mr. Lasker's cart he could have told Mr. Lasker that Billy was coming with them.
ReplyDeleteMatt and Tyler -- nicely explained -- and I agree with you both.
ReplyDeleteThank you.
ReplyDeleteI think it isn't fair because its Pas kid, but its also Mr. Laskers fault because he should have checked with pa before they left to see if they had everyone and instead of sending Sam by himself Mr.Lasker should have gone.
ReplyDeleteBecause Pa had to stay with Sams mother.
ReplyDelete